Search results

@Giulia Shah, exactly. A listing can disappear because it sold, was reserved, was withdrawn or was replaced under another entry. Unless those outcomes are separated, the 47 days should be treated as a listing-platform measure, not a clean measure of sale time.

Watch the wording around price cuts as well. A reduction from an unrealistic launch price does not necessarily create a bargain. Compare the revised ask with completed transactions, not merely with the seller’s original number.

For Stockholm flats, I’d also separate ownership structure and building-level finances from the interior. Two apparently similar new flats can carry different ongoing costs or future uncertainty, which buyers may express through the bid rather than calling it a condition issue.

Near-zero cash flow is not automatically a reason to sell if debt is being reduced or you have another clear reason to hold. But near zero before a realistic vacancy allowance and maintenance reserve is different: that is probably negative cash flow disguised by a normal month. I would...