Search results

Buyer financing can blur the timing as well. “Found a buyer” might mean an offer was accepted, financing was settled, or the deal completed. Make sure the completed-sale timeline and the listing timeline use comparable endpoints.

The matched-table idea makes sense, though I would hesitate to compare medians until the properties are split into genuinely similar groups. For each one, record the neighbourhood, condition, first listing date, original and final ask, completion price and completion date. Publication timing is...

I would not treat ¥459,500 as the target until you know comparable homes actually let near that amount. Start with the cost of losing this tenant: likely vacancy time, work needed between tenancies and any reletting expenses. Then compare that with the extra annual rent from a modest adjustment...

Also clarify what the 96 days measures. Days until an advert is marked unavailable is not necessarily days until the transaction completes. Relisting can reset the visible clock, while stale adverts may remain online after a deal is agreed.

I would compare both options over the same expected ownership period rather than treating a lower future rate as a guaranteed saving. For buying now, include the current payment, arrangement fees and a scenario where refinancing never becomes attractive. Then test a rate reset above 7.10%. For...

Given the possible move, I would compare total cash paid up to several plausible exit dates rather than rely on APR alone. Run the monthly payments, upfront fees, and any repayment charge at perhaps an early, middle, and full-term exit. APR is useful for an initial comparison, but it may not...

Cross-country coverage sounds useful, but shallow local data could make the handoff worse rather than better. Planning information and required property fields differ between jurisdictions, while poor mobile access or unclear document versions will cause problems during ordinary visits. I would...