Boston duplex at $365,000 and $2,276/month — what am I missing?

tradeTheFinch

Real estate agent
The 7.5% gross yield looks adequate at first glance. My concern is that one Boston-specific expense could remove most of the margin on a first rental.

The property is a 3-bed duplex priced at $365,000, with projected rent of $2,276 per month. I have budgeted for vacancy, management, recurring maintenance and a substantial repair, but the treatment of shared or service costs remains unclear. Before judging an acceptable net return, which address-specific figures would you obtain for tax, insurance, utilities and financing, and how severely would you stress the vacancy assumption?
 
The gross figure is right: $27,312 annual rent divided by $365,000 is about 7.5%. I would focus first on property tax and insurance rather than maintenance. Get figures tied to this exact address and intended rental use, not broad estimates. Also clarify what “service charges” cover and whether any major shared work is being discussed.
 
Is $2,276 the rent for the entire duplex or one unit? And will any utilities remain with the owner? Those two details could change the picture substantially. I’d also model tenant turnover separately from ordinary vacancy because cleaning, minor repairs and leasing costs can arrive together.
 
Once loan payments are added, there is a second question: can the deal survive a difficult year without requiring regular cash injections? A respectable return before debt can still produce weak cash flow if the rate is higher than expected or principal repayments are heavy.

I would model the proposed loan first, then repeat the calculation with a higher interest cost, one empty month and a major repair occurring together. That does not replace the property-level yield, but it shows whether the financing leaves enough monthly room.
 
Slight disagreement with Ana: financing matters for your cash return, but it shouldn’t determine whether the property itself is economically sound. Calculate two views—net operating income against the total purchase cost, then cash flow against the cash you invest. Keeping those separate makes it harder for leverage to disguise a thin rental margin.
 
The phrase “building looks sound” would not reassure me enough on a first rental. The costly items are often the ones that do not affect appearance: roof, heating, plumbing, electrical systems and any shared structure. I’d want the inspection findings translated into a five-year spending schedule, not just a single generic repair reserve.
 
Don’t forget acquisition costs in the denominator if you’re judging the return on the full amount committed. I’d make a simple monthly sheet with rent, vacancy, management, tax, insurance, owner-paid utilities, service charges and maintenance. Then put turnover and major repairs in separate annual lines so they aren’t hidden inside one percentage assumption.
 
One more practical step: ask for the actual recent tax bill, insurance quotes, service-charge history and whatever records show past maintenance. Compare those with the seller’s rent assumption and current lease details. If the deal only works when every estimate is favorable, the 7.5% headline yield is not providing much room for a first-time landlord’s surprises.
 
Back
Top