Sixteen days into the budget review, the headline figure still looks plausible. My concern is how much of the €240,400 rests on conditions nobody has yet inspected in the 255 m² detached house in Utrecht.
We are allowing for work to the kitchen and bathrooms, new floor finishes, decorating, electrical investigation and limited energy improvements. There is no proposed addition, although hidden damp, inaccessible plumbing or remedial structural work could still disrupt the sequence.
Before choosing a contingency, what missing fact would you establish first? I am considering asking the surveyor to identify where moisture readings and opening-up checks are needed, then having each contractor separate actual repairs from testing allowances and list exclusions. Material lead times could then be tied to a programme rather than treated as a general risk.
We are allowing for work to the kitchen and bathrooms, new floor finishes, decorating, electrical investigation and limited energy improvements. There is no proposed addition, although hidden damp, inaccessible plumbing or remedial structural work could still disrupt the sequence.
Before choosing a contingency, what missing fact would you establish first? I am considering asking the surveyor to identify where moisture readings and opening-up checks are needed, then having each contractor separate actual repairs from testing allowances and list exclusions. Material lead times could then be tied to a programme rather than treated as a general risk.