Credit or price reduction for A$13,680 of repairs on a Brisbane country home?

B

bram_wilde

Property investor
The inspection on a 230 m² country home in Brisbane found several genuine but manageable issues, with estimates totalling about A$13,680. The seller has offered to organise the work, but I would rather choose the contractors and control the standard of repair.

Would a credit at settlement generally be more useful than reducing the purchase price? I am checking whether the lender limits concessions, and I also need to respond within the inspection deadline. I am mainly trying to understand the financing, appraisal and deposit risks rather than seeking reassurance about the location.
 
If your priority is control, seller-arranged repairs are the least attractive option unless the contract specifies the scope, evidence of completion and what happens if work is late. A settlement credit may preserve cash for the repairs, but only if your lender accepts it. A price reduction can be cleaner, although it may not leave you with A$13,680 available after settlement because the loan amount can also change.
 
What are the issues, and are any urgent enough to affect insurance, occupancy or the lender's valuation? That matters more than the total estimate. Also, is A$13,680 based on written quotes or an inspector's allowance? Before choosing a remedy, ask the lender how each option affects approval and ask your conveyancer how to preserve the inspection protection before the response deadline.
 
I would not automatically reject the seller doing the work. If the seller is motivated and settlement is not close, completed repairs remove the buyer's risk that the estimates are too low. The problem is quality control. A vague promise to “fix the items” is weak; a clearly agreed list, suitable contractors and proof that the work was completed would be materially different.
 
There is also a negotiation point: do not treat the A$13,680 estimate as an automatic dollar-for-dollar adjustment. Compare the agreed price with completed comparable sales and consider whether the home was already priced for its condition. If there is an appraisal gap, reducing the price may help financing more than a credit. If the valuation is comfortable, approved settlement funds may be more useful for actually commissioning the work.
 
I would put two alternatives to the seller before the deadline: an approved settlement adjustment for an agreed amount, or a price reduction, both subject to confirmation from the lender and conveyancer. That reveals seller motivation without giving up your preferred solution. Keep any inspection-clause notice requirements separate from informal negotiation; missing a contractual step while discussing repairs could create unnecessary deposit exposure.
 
Get the lender's answer in writing before agreeing to the credit. Ask whether it is permitted, whether it must appear in the contract, and whether it changes the loan or valuation. Then have the conveyancer confirm the wording and deadline under the Queensland contract. If neither route preserves enough cash, you could seek a smaller adjustment and retain your own repair reserve rather than forcing the full estimate into one concession.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top