How far below ₩828m would you open on this Seoul student property?

L

lookTheRiver

Homeowner
Established
Thirteen percent below ₩828,000,000 is the number I am considering for an opening offer on a Seoul student-housing property. It has been listed for 54 days and requires updating, but the evidence is awkward: comparable listings support the asking range, while reliable completed transactions are too limited for me to identify the actual market level.

I can provide clear financing evidence and accommodate the seller on completion timing. Would you submit the 13% reduction immediately with the condition and updating costs explained, or first ask what matters most to the seller and adjust the terms accordingly? I do not want a low opening number to close the conversation, but I would still retain inspection protection and the other essential conditions.
 
Thirteen percent below is not automatically unreasonable when condition and completed comparables are uncertain. Present it as a supported price, not a criticism: current condition, estimated updating work and limited evidence from closed transactions. Keep the financing proof and flexible completion prominent.
 
Before choosing the number, is it vacant or occupied, and does the sale include any existing tenancy arrangements? With student housing, the value and practical cost of updating can look very different if work must be scheduled around occupants.
 
I’d be careful about reading too much into 54 days. It may indicate weak demand, but it may equally mean the seller is patient. I would still offer, though I’d avoid saying that time on market proves the listing is overpriced.
 
Seller motivation matters more than whether 13% sounds polite. Ask the agent what completion timing the seller prefers and whether previous discussions failed over price, financing or conditions. You may have leverage through certainty and timing rather than by defending every won of the discount.
 
I would not waive an inspection appropriate to the building, financing protection if borrowing is required, or the ability to confirm the property’s permitted use and tenancy position. The exact contract treatment is jurisdiction-specific, so have a Seoul-qualified adviser explain when your deposit becomes exposed.
 
The weak point is the comparable evidence. Similar asking prices tell you about seller expectations, not accepted prices. Ask the local representative advising you to locate the most relevant completed transactions and explain differences in size, condition, location and use before you submit.
 
I wouldn’t wait for perfect comparables if they simply aren’t available. Make the offer conditional enough to control the downside, but keep the written rationale short. A long list of defects can antagonise a seller more than a low number does.
 
Clean financing only helps if it is demonstrated credibly. Include proof suited to your funding position, while disclosing no more private information than necessary. Also decide now how you would handle an appraisal below the agreed price; otherwise the financing claim may be less reassuring than it appears.
 
Give the offer a clear response deadline, but not one so short that it looks theatrical. It should allow the seller and their adviser a realistic opportunity to consider the terms. Your flexibility on completion can then feel like a genuine benefit rather than pressure attached to a low bid.
 
Have you priced the updating beyond a rough visual estimate? A 13% reduction equals a substantial amount here. If the likely work is much smaller, the seller may dismiss a repair-based explanation. Separate the cost of necessary work from improvements that are mainly your preference.
 
Because it is student housing, I’d also examine the income side if it is operated as an investment property: actual occupancy arrangements, current income and recurring costs. A comparable residential asking price may be less informative if this property’s value depends materially on its operation.
 
Agreed on separating required repairs from optional upgrades. Inspection protection should let you investigate material condition, not serve as a vague second negotiation. Decide in advance what finding would make you walk away, seek a credit or proceed at the agreed price.
 
On credits, don’t ask for both the full 13% reduction and a generous allowance for obvious work already reflected in that offer. Reserve repair-credit discussions for significant issues discovered later. Otherwise the seller may see the opening price as only the first of several reductions.
 
The appraisal gap deserves its own limit. Work out how much cash, if any, you would add if the valuation comes in below the contract price. Don’t promise to cover an unlimited gap merely to make the initial offer look stronger.
 
Deposit exposure is where I’d be least casual. Before transferring anything, understand the contract conditions, deadlines, refund circumstances and consequences of failing to complete. Those details depend on the Seoul transaction and contract, so general overseas buying habits may not translate cleanly.
 
I’d package the offer in layers: price, financing evidence, preferred completion range, inspection and financing conditions, then an expiry. Avoid mixing in ten minor requests. If the seller counters, you can trade movement on price for something valuable such as timing rather than conceding unconditionally.
 
Also confirm exactly what “student housing” means for this particular property. The label could affect which comparables are genuinely relevant. That classification and the intended use are matters to verify locally rather than assume from the marketing description.
 
If completed-sales evidence remains thin, use a range rather than pretending the answer is precise. Set three figures privately: your opening, the point where you expect a reasonable counter, and your absolute ceiling after updating costs. Only the first belongs in the offer.
 
A seller may react better to “this is the price that works for us given the present condition” than to an argument that their ₩828,000,000 figure is wrong. The distinction is small, but it leaves room for a counter without asking them to admit they mispriced it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top