I am balancing two reasonable approaches: keep inspection extras under control, or pay for the one check that could expose a very expensive problem. The property is an older 480 sq ft Montreal townhouse, and the booked general inspection does not cover the sewer serving the unit.
Large trees stand close to the street, while the estimate I received for complete line replacement was C$35,100. A separate camera scope is much cheaper, but it would compete with moving expenses, the first mortgage payment, immediate repairs and the emergency fund.
Would you order the scope based on the age, trees and potential cost alone, or only after drainage symptoms? I also need to confirm whether the relevant pipe is privately owned, shared, or covered by common service charges, because that could change both the risk and who pays. I would be interested in whether townhouse ownership alters the usual calculation.
Large trees stand close to the street, while the estimate I received for complete line replacement was C$35,100. A separate camera scope is much cheaper, but it would compete with moving expenses, the first mortgage payment, immediate repairs and the emergency fund.
Would you order the scope based on the age, trees and potential cost alone, or only after drainage symptoms? I also need to confirm whether the relevant pipe is privately owned, shared, or covered by common service charges, because that could change both the risk and who pays. I would be interested in whether townhouse ownership alters the usual calculation.