Is a sewer scope worth adding to an inspection in Sydney?

[loft.balanced]

The general inspection is now booked, which leaves me deciding whether to add a sewer camera inspection. It is a 205 m² older detached home in Sydney, and the standard inspection does not cover the private drain. Mature street-side trees add to the concern.

I was quoted A$50,160 for a complete replacement, although I realise that figure may not apply to every defect. Would you order the camera inspection without symptoms such as odours or slow drainage? Before relying on the quote, I plan to confirm the section covered, ownership near the street boundary and whether footage and a route map are provided. I am reluctant to reduce the cash set aside for moving, inspection repairs, the insurance excess and the first mortgage payment.

 

[LightStory]

With an older home, nearby trees and that replacement estimate, I would add the scope even without visible symptoms. A drain can still be flowing while having root intrusion, cracks or a partial blockage. Ask what section will actually be inspected and whether you receive footage showing the line’s condition and route; otherwise “scope included” may not tell you much.

 

[CommonEcho]

I agree it is worth considering, but I would not treat A$50,160 as the inevitable cost of every defect. First clarify what that estimate covers and whether the private line is entirely your responsibility, particularly near the street boundary. Then use the scope findings to distinguish maintenance from an urgent repair or full replacement. Until that is clear, delaying furniture purchases seems more useful than cutting the emergency fund.