I can compare the loans by their five-year cash cost, but that risks ignoring an expensive reset afterward. I can also favour flexible exit terms, though paying more today for portability I may never use is not especially comfortable.
The offer is 6.85% fixed for five years on a Manila property priced at about PHP 32,190,000. Fees and the applicable loan-to-value band make the headline rate a poor comparison on its own.
My current plan is to put each lender on the same loan balance and repayment schedule, include upfront and financed fees, and total the outflow during the fixed period. Then I would test the payment at the later reset rather than assume refinancing will be available. For portability and early repayment, which wording would materially change that comparison: preservation of the existing rate, a fresh approval requirement, or a charge for leaving early?
The offer is 6.85% fixed for five years on a Manila property priced at about PHP 32,190,000. Fees and the applicable loan-to-value band make the headline rate a poor comparison on its own.
My current plan is to put each lender on the same loan balance and repayment schedule, include upfront and financed fees, and total the outflow during the fixed period. Then I would test the payment at the later reset rather than assume refinancing will be available. For portability and early repayment, which wording would materially change that comparison: preservation of the existing rate, a fresh approval requirement, or a charge for leaving early?