Offering 8% below asking on an Oslo detached home after 34 days

A

AmberPost

First-time buyer
Established
I’ve checked nearby listings, the visible updating work and the 34 days on market. What I still lack is enough reliable sale evidence to know where this Oslo detached home is likely to clear. It is advertised at NOK 10,220,000.

I’m thinking of offering NOK 9,402,400, which is 8% lower, with financing arranged and flexibility over completion. I would keep the explanation focused on the limited completed evidence and the expensive work, rather than catalogue every cosmetic fault. A repair credit could be an alternative if the seller resists the opening price.

Would you submit that as a firm figure or make it conditional on inspection and valuation, with a defined route for dealing with major defects? I also want a reasonable response deadline without surrendering protection against structural problems or an appraisal gap.
 
Keep the rationale short: time on market, visible updating needs and limited evidence from completed sales. Financing proof and a completion date that suits the seller make the offer stronger without raising it. I would keep inspection protection for major structural or costly concealed issues. Give a reasonable response deadline rather than making it feel like an ultimatum.
 
Before choosing the deadline, ask the agent what matters besides price. Is the seller waiting for another purchase, seeking a fast completion, or needing more time? That may be where your flexibility has value.

Also clarify your exposure if the valuation comes in below the agreed amount. “Clean financing” is not the same as being able to absorb an appraisal gap, and you should understand when any deposit becomes exposed under the proposed terms.
 
I’d be careful about justifying the full 8% through updating costs. The seller may view those as already reflected in the asking price, especially if comparable asking prices are close. Offer the number you can defend, but don’t combine a large discount with demands for credits for every known repair.

My practical route: submit financing evidence, state the flexible completion window, retain protection for significant unknown defects, and reserve repair-credit discussions for genuinely new findings. Have the exact conditions and deadline checked for the Oslo transaction before submitting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top