If I misread the few available comparables, the $960,000 ask could look justified simply because three current sellers want similar prices. The property is a roughly 1,830 sq ft, 2-bed new-build flat in Boston. It has good light and a strong location, but the finishes look dated for something marketed as new construction, and there may be costs connected with rental restrictions.
Only one of my four comparables is a completed transaction. I am inclined to anchor on that sale and use the active listings only as evidence of seller expectations. A smaller flat can achieve a higher price per square foot, for example, so applying its rate directly to 1,830 sq ft could overstate value.
The next step is to confirm usable floor area, exact micro-location, parking rights, outdoor space, recurring building charges and any lease term before adjusting for condition. Which of those would most affect your comparison? I will obtain a local appraisal before treating the estimate as reliable.
Only one of my four comparables is a completed transaction. I am inclined to anchor on that sale and use the active listings only as evidence of seller expectations. A smaller flat can achieve a higher price per square foot, for example, so applying its rate directly to 1,830 sq ft could overstate value.
The next step is to confirm usable floor area, exact micro-location, parking rights, outdoor space, recurring building charges and any lease term before adjusting for condition. Which of those would most affect your comparison? I will obtain a local appraisal before treating the estimate as reliable.