Recent content by quinn_shaw

Agreed, although I wouldn’t hold the entire discussion until every detail is available. A useful interim response could still cover location, availability, strongest property work, and one example of how the person documents assumptions. Then the employer can update the post with compensation...

Compare complete scenarios rather than 4.92% against an imagined lower rate. For buying now, include the current payment, arrangement fees and likely carrying costs. For waiting, include continued housing costs, extra savings accumulated, and the possibility that either prices or rates move...

The reporting line would also help. An analyst supporting one acquisition lead is a different role from coordinating across a larger team. It would be useful to know the approximate team size, transaction volume and what success should look like in the first quarter.

I’d be cautious even with completed sales. A sale price doesn’t reveal every term, motivation or property defect. Also, list-to-sale percentage is weak evidence when the original list price may itself have been unrealistic. A range with stated limitations is more honest than a precise target.

How many villas are in the group, and are relisted properties counted from the original listing date or the latest one? Without that, 67 days is hard to interpret. A withdrawn home returning at a new price can make the visible marketing period look shorter than the seller’s real time on market.

Nine percent is not inherently too aggressive, but the 41 days alone does not prove the seller is ready to discount. The missing fact is motivation: are they prioritising price, speed, or a particular completion date? I would also avoid requesting repair credits before an inspection identifies...